Just because you did something wrong in the past doesn’t mean you can’t advocate against it now. It doesn’t make you a hypocrite. You just grew. Don’t let people use your past to invalidate your current mindset.
Bruh. This needs to be a mandatory post on everybody’s blog. Y'all really be pullin out decade old receipts like woah.
Either you want people to grow and change or you want people to stay evil villains soyou can feel superior as you shame them.
sometimes I see older people and I’m like... how do you do it? how do you cope with the loss of people and places and things as life progresses
We need more toxic homoerotic friendships between girls in media. Like in Jennifer’s body
Absolutely OBSESSED with this teapot from 1882
This caption is really underselling it. From auction description:
A ROYAL WORCESTER AESTHETIC TEAPOT AND COVER, DATED 1882
The double-sided vessel finely modelled, one side as an effete young man, the other side as a lovesick maiden, the spout formed by their conjoined ‘mediaeval hand’, their other arm forming the handle, he sports a sunflower, she a lily on their neatly tailored 'Greenery-Yellowy’ suit, inscribed underneath 'Fearful consequences through the laws of Natural Selection and Evolution of Living up to one’s Teapot’, 15.5cm high, puce factory mark, registration mark and designer’s name 'Budge’ (restored) (2)
This celebrated teapot satirises Oscar Wilde and the entire Aesthetic movement that swept the London art scene around 1880. The principal inspiration was Gilbert and Sullivan’s comic operetta 'Patience’, first performed in 1881. Worcester’s design also pokes fun at an exhibition held at the Grosvenor Gallery when a single Chinese teapot was put on display to represent perfection in design and visitors were invited to go home and 'Live up to it’. The inscription alludes to this, as well as the controversy still raging over Darwin’s theories on Evolution. The identity of 'Budge’ whose name appears on the base has proved elusive but may possibly be a pseudonym chosen by Worcester’s Art Director, R W Binns.
The reverse:
I don’t think bombing civilians in war torn countries is an unfortunate necessity like it literally doesn’t have to happen and I don’t understand how people can be so indifferent about it if their team is doing it....you know 90% of the victims of Obama’s air strikes were civilians. And civilian means woman, girl, or male child under fighting age. Adult men weren’t counted towards civilian death tolls. So the actual civilian death toll is closer to 100%. Our military is literally a terrorist organization and nobody cares as long as the president is a decent orator. All of those people are just as real as you are. A million innocent people have died as a result of the Iraq war both directly and indirectly and only a handful of us seem to lose any sleep over the fact that this terrorism is done in our names witn our money. People talk about them like they’re cockroaches. It makes me sick to my stomach
